![]() ![]() ![]() The simple facts of the matter are that even though some of the developers are quite keen on the idea, it's not going to happen unless the people who own the big numbers of seats (and we're talking hundreds of thousands) actually want it. If by 'dismissive' you mean explaining why it's not there, then you are correct. The best you could hope for would be Rewire to be reintroduced, although it didn't work very well previously.Īnd this is an old thread - the issue doesn't need rehashing any more, thank you. The original MIDI spec was always something of an anachronism there would be no point in supporting it now with Audition, as there's a more modern spec available, with halfway decent resolution, which the original never had. And as we suspected it would at the time that Adobe bought out Syntrillium, it has been more integrated with the rest of the Adobe offerings, and they are primarily visual - that's really what Adobe specialises in, and not music creation, for which there is already more than enough software. Primarily it is, and always has been, audio editing software. Whilst Audition is prefectly capable of making fully professional studio recordings, that's not its primary reason for existing. The reason that it was quite correct is that the system had only ever been declared to be in a beta state, and Adobe would not, at that stage, allow any beta software to be released in a product, and it was not deemed possible within the release schedule to have 'fixed' it. Audition 3 had primitive MIDI recording facilities added, but because Adobe would forever be playing catch-up, they weren't included in the CS rewrite when everything to do with it was, quite correctly, dropped. The code has been rewritten from the ground up several times since Cool Edit Pro, the primary rewrite to make it cross-platform. It was only Cool Edit Pro 2 that had any MIDI facilities at all, and they were replay only. The original Cool Edit Pro never had any MIDI facilities, and neither is Audition related in any way, other than the way it looks, to it. That's simply not true, and you haven't even got the previous name correct.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |